Mapping outcomes to coreVWD: moving toward a fully reportable core outcome set to improve access to treatment for people with von Willebrand Disease (VWD)

Clearfield, E., Ayoub, E., Ziemele, B., Delaney, M., Youttananukorn, T., Coffin, D., Brennan, F., Kucher, A., Skinner, M. W., & James, P. (2025, August). Mapping outcomes to coreVWD: Moving toward a fully reportable core outcome set to improve access to treatment for people with von Willebrand disease (VWD) [Poster presentation]. National Bleeding Disorders Foundation (NBDF) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Objective

The VWD treatment landscape is expanding; to assess upcoming products for efficacy and cost-effectiveness, outcomes must be harmonized across clinical trials, registries, and post-market studies. The coreVWD Initiative (Clearfield, Haemophilia 2024) convened a multi-stakeholder group to align on a recommended core outcome set important to decision-makers across the product lifecycle. Outcomes were prioritized for prophylaxis, perioperative treatment, and for women, girls, and people with the potential to menstruate (WGPPM); adverse events were also considered. To fully utilize these recommendations, we must now identify how to most efficiently measure, collect and report them.  

 Aims

Using coreVWD as a benchmark, to map the core outcomes identified to those currently collected in prominent ongoing studies and identify points of overlap and gaps to be covered by updated or new measurement tools.  

 Methods 

We compared the coreVWD core outcomes to the World Federation of Hemophilia’s World Bleeding Disorders Registry (WBDR) and myWBDR app datasets and to variables collected in the Patient Reported Outcomes Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Study, a quality-of-life study for people with hemophilia  

 Results

Frequency of bleeds and bleeds requiring treatment are well covered by WBDR, myWBDR, and PROBE, but other descriptions of bleeding are only captured dependent on what Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT) is used (Table). Information about perioperative bleed control is only collected in WBDR. All three tools could better cover the core outcomes if they enhanced or added a section for WGPPM on menstrual bleeding and pregnancy experiences. 

 Conclusion 

coreVWD prioritized outcomes important to patients; the coreVWD outcomes will require both patient and clinically reported data. This initial analysis provides a foundation to assess completeness and fitness for purpose. Future research will assess data gaps and explore possible revisions to allow WBDR, myWBDR, or PROBE to capture additional coreVWD outcomes. Comprehensively collecting patient-important outcomes will support treatment advances for people with VWD. 

Abstract: HERE (TBA)

Development of a WGPPM-Focused PROBE Survey: Addressing Underrepresentation in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Research

Kucher, A., Skinner, M. W., Clearfield, E., Brennan, F., Rotellini, D., Colle, Y., & Wilton, P. A. (2025). Development of a WGPPM-Focused PROBE Survey: Addressing underrepresentation in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life research [Poster presentation]. National Bleeding Disorders Foundation (NBDF) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Objective

Women, Girls, and People with the Potential to Menstruate (WGPPM), including those with von Willebrand disease (VWD), platelet function disorders, rare coagulation factor deficiencies, and other rare bleeding disorders, remain significantly underrepresented in research related to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Existing tools such as the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens, and Experiences (PROBE) survey—originally developed in 2012—have primarily focused on individuals with hemophilia A or B and carriers, with data also collected from individuals without a bleeding disorder (NoBD) serving as a control group. However, the unique experiences, burdens, and health impacts specific to WGPPM have not been fully captured in existing survey instruments.

 Methods 

To address this gap, a targeted literature review using PubMed was conducted to identify key concepts influencing the quality of life in WGPPM. In parallel, the study team contributed historical examples of related surveys for review. These sources were analyzed to identify novel domains and items, which were then organized into a conceptual framework. This framework was compared against the existing PROBE questionnaire to assess gaps in content coverage. Based on this analysis, the PROBE instrument was revised to include concepts relevant to WGPPM. The development process was undertaken in collaboration with key stakeholders, including the World Federation of Hemophilia, Coalition of the Americas, European Haemophilia Consortium, and the National Bleeding Disorders Foundation, all of whom contributed to a dedicated working group guiding this initiative.

 Summary

The updated framework expands the PROBE instrument with an additional 13 questions which include several WGPPM-specific concepts, such as access to healthcare (including specialty care), emergency department utilization, and bleeding episodes unique to this population, including menstruation and gynecological complications. Additional domains address reproductive decision-making, including considerations around family planning, as well as the social and emotional impact of living with a bleeding disorder—particularly as it pertains to leisure activities and interpersonal relationships. Furthermore, the revised tool allows for improved representation of individuals with rare and often overlooked bleeding disorders.

 Conclusion 

The WGPPM-specific PROBE exploratory pilot was launched in early 2025 through an online platform. It is anticipated that this pilot will generate comprehensive and representative data to better understand the lived experiences of WGPPM. These findings will inform future efforts in research, advocacy, clinical care, and health policy, while also serving as the basis for subsequent updates to the PROBE questionnaire to ensure its continued inclusivity and relevance.

Abstract: HERE

Feasibility of Administering the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Questionnaire Through the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) and Comparison of Data From the Two Sources

F. GerminiC. CossaE. Trinari, et al. “ Feasibility of Administering the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Questionnaire Through the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) and Comparison of Data From the Two Sources.” Haemophilia (2025): . https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70117

Introduction

The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire can be used to measure quality of life in persons with haemophilia (PWH) and is integrated in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR). This offers the opportunity to compare the same data inputted by patients in PROBE and their treating team in CBDR.

Aim

Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting PROBE data through CBDR and to compare the data collected from these two sources.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study among PWH using MyCBDR. Participants were invited to digitally complete the PROBE questionnaire at baseline and to repeat it at 6 and 12 months. Additional data were passively collected through CBDR. Data from PROBE and CBDR were compared using Kappa agreement, intraclass correlation (ICC) and Pearson correlation.

Results

A total of 142 PWH participated. Recruitment ratios were 21.1% and 12.0% for the two phases. Retention rates were 40.8% at 6 months and 32.4% at 12 months.

Three hundred thirteen subjects were involved in the comparison between PROBE and CBDR data. The agreement was good to very good (κ > 0.75) or the correlation very strong, with the exception of the history of inhibitor (κ = 0.57), recent bleeds (κ = 0.48) and current treatment regimen (κ = 0.57).

Conclusions

The integration of PROBE with CBDR is feasible and PROBE is a reliable tool for routine PRO data collection. Its use in clinical practice may improve data quality and personalized and patient-centred care.

View Poster: HERE

Mapping outcomes to coreVWD: moving toward a fully reportable core outcome set to improve access to treatment for people with von Willebrand Disease (VWD)

Clearfield, E., Ayoub, E., Ziemele, B., Delaney, M., Youttananukorn, T., Coffin, D., Brennan, F., Kucher, A., Skinner, M. W., & James, P. (2025). Mapping outcomes to coreVWD: Moving toward a fully reportable core outcome set to improve access to treatment for people with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) [Abstract]. ISTH. https://www.rpthjournal.org/issue/S2475-0379(24)X0006-0

Background 

The VWD treatment landscape is expanding; to assess upcoming products for efficacy and cost-effectiveness, outcomes must be harmonized across clinical trials, registries, and post-market studies. The coreVWD Initiative (Clearfield, Haemophilia 2024) convened a multi-stakeholder group to align on a recommended core outcome set important to decision-makers across the product lifecycle. Outcomes were prioritized for prophylaxis, perioperative treatment, and for women, girls, and people with the potential to menstruate (WGPPM); adverse events were also considered. To fully utilize these recommendations, we must now identify how to most efficiently measure, collect and report them.  

 Aims 

Using coreVWD as a benchmark, to map the core outcomes identified to those currently collected in prominent ongoing studies and identify points of overlap and gaps to be covered by updated or new measurement tools.  

 Methods 

We compared the coreVWD core outcomes to the World Federation of Hemophilia’s World Bleeding Disorders Registry (WBDR) and myWBDR app datasets and to variables collected in the Patient Reported Outcomes Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Study, a quality-of-life study for people with hemophilia.   

 Results 

Frequency of bleeds and bleeds requiring treatment are well covered by WBDR, myWBDR, and PROBE, but other descriptions of bleeding are only captured dependent on what Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT) is used (Table). Information about perioperative bleed control is only collected in WBDR. All three tools could better cover the core outcomes if they enhanced or added a section for WGPPM on menstrual bleeding and pregnancy experiences. 

 Conclusion 

coreVWD prioritized outcomes important to patients; the coreVWD outcomes will require both patient and clinically reported data. This initial analysis provides a foundation to assess completeness and fitness for purpose. Future research will assess data gaps and explore possible revisions to allow WBDR, myWBDR, or PROBE to capture additional coreVWD outcomes. Comprehensively collecting patient-important outcomes will support treatment advances for people with VWD. 

Mapping of coreVWD core outcomes to WBDR, myWBDR, and the PROBE Study Data Elements 
Type of Study  coreVWD core set  WFH WBDR Section 

(Clinician-reported) 

myWBDR Section 

(Patient-reported) 

PROBE Study* Question 

(Patient-reported) 

All   Severity of bleeds  BAT Score1,2  Patient-reported bleed    
Duration of bleeds  BAT Score1,2     
Bleeds requiring treatment  BAT Score1,2, Treatment History  Patient-reported bleed  Treatment product and treatment regimen 
Prophylaxis Treatment  Frequency of bleeds  Bleeding Events Assessment  Patient-reported bleed  Number of bleeds in last year, and last two weeks 
Mucocutaneous bleeds  BAT Score1,2 (focused on epistaxis and mouth bleeding), Bleeding Events Assessment  Patient-reported bleed   
Musculoskeletal bleeds  BAT Score1, Bleeding Events Assessment  Patient-reported bleed  Problem joints and range of motion 
Bleed control: non-surgical bleeds requiring additional treatment  BAT Score1,2, Treatment Module  Patient-reported bleed, Patient-reported treatment  Treatment product and treatment regimen 
Quality of life (QOL)  EQ-5D-5L  EQ-5D-5L  EQ-5D-5L 
Perioperative 

 Treatment 

Re-admission to hospital       
Ability to undergo invasive diagnostic or surgical procedures  BAT Score2,3    Treatment regimen and question about invasive procedures 
Bleed control: with prophylaxis prior to surgery  BAT Score2, Treatment Module  Patient-reported bleed, Patient-reported treatment   
Bleed control: without prophylaxis prior to surgery  BAT Score2, Treatment Module     
Number of administrations needed to treat surgical bleeds       
WGPPM 

Health 

Menstrual blood loss  BAT Score1,2,3, Bleeding Events Assessment, Hospital Admission Module  Patient-reported bleed    
Menstrual period duration  BAT Score1,3     
Heavy menstrual bleeding requiring treatment  BAT Score1,2,3  Patient-reported bleed    
Need for blood transfusion from menstrual blood loss  BAT Score1,2,3    Invasive procedures 
Postpartum hemorrhage  BAT Score1,2,3, Hospital Admission Module, Pregnancy Module  Patient-reported bleed   Health problems and conditions 
Need for blood transfusion peri-partum  BAT Score1,2,3    Invasive procedures 
Adverse Events  Inhibitor development  VWF Inhibitor History, Inhibitor Assessment Module    Current inhibitor and question about ever having an inhibitor 
Thromboembolic events  Adverse Events Module    Health problems and conditions 
Mortality  Mortality Section     
Pregnancy: serious adverse event in mother  Pregnancy Module  Patient-reported bleed   

Empty cells represent data gaps. Grayed cells indicate partial coverage or that outcome can be derived from data dependent on type of assessment used and/or detail provided in open text boxes.  
1 BAT Scores assessed Self-BAT
2 BAT Scores assessed by ISTH BAT
3 BAT Scores assessed by MCMDM-1
*PROBE is collected as part of the myWBDR PRO module, or can be administered independently
PROBE is a quality-of-life study, further description of what should be included as QOL for those with VWD is needed 

Abstract: HERE

Comparing Health Outcomes for Women and Girls with Hemophilia and No Bleeding Disorder – Insights from the Patient Reported Outcomes Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Study

Skinner M. W., Kucher A., Clearfield E., Curtis R. G., Germini F., Iorio A., Nichol M., Page D., Stonebraker J. Development of Women, Girls, and People Who Have or Had the Potential to Menstruate (WGPPM) questionnaire for PROBE study. (2025), Book of Abstracts. Haemophilia, 31: 21-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70032

Objective

There is limited comparative quality-of-life (QoL) data for women and girls with hemophilia A or B who have the potential to menstruate (WGwH). To advance management and treatment it is essential to collect patient-reported health outcomes data.  The validated PROBE questionnaire collects health-related QoL data from WGwH, including carriers, and women and girls who have the potential to mensurate without a bleeding disorder (NoBD) who serve as a control group. We compared the QoL of WGwH with NoBD.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study from the PROBE database. We included WGwH ≥ age 13 who self-reported hemophilia A or B, as a carrier with a factor level <40%, or NoBD that were identified in the PROBE database. We used descriptive statistics to provide a summary of participant characteristics (Table 1).

Results

From 2015 to 2024, 232 WGwH indicated that they had severe (n=70), moderate (n=26) or mild (n=136) factor deficiency and 407 NoBD were available for comparison. Prophylaxis use was 65.71% in WGwH classified as severe, 19.23% in moderate, and 5.15% in mild. Use of mobility aids was 14.29% in severe, 38.46% in moderate, 14.71% in mild WGwH, and 8.85% in NoBD. Participants with moderate and mild hemophilia reported that this condition impacted important QoL metrics for: chronic pain (CP), target/problem joints (TJ/PJ), reduced joint range of motion (ROM) and difficulties with activities of daily living (ADL) (CP 61.54%, 44.85%; TJ/PJ 50%, 21.32%; ROM 50.0%, 19.85%; ADL 46.15%, 21.32% respectively). See Table 1.

Conclusions

Our study suggests a worse QoL for WGwH compared to NoBD, with a worsening trend with increasing severity. This analysis confirms prior research (Chai-Adisakosopha Haemophilia 2020) showing that non-severe hemophilia is not benign.  WGwH are affected by their bleeding disorders. PROBE data collection for WGwH and further analysis are on-going.

Table 1. Participant Characteristics
Severe Moderate Mild No BD
n1 70 26 136 407
Age (SD) 37.19 (11.52) 41.69 (14.77) 45.09 (14.83) 44.58 (14.75)
Years of education (SD) 15.87 (4.87) 15.4 (3.88) 15.84 (4.5) 16.87 (4.47)
Hemophilia A1 65 (92.86%) 21 (80.77%) 118 (86.76%) n/a
Regular prophylaxis 46 (65.71%) 5 (19.23%) 7 (5.15%) n/a
Intermediate prophylaxis 5 (7.14%) 8 (30.77%) 7 (5.15%) n/a
Episodic (On-demand) treatment 12 (17.14%) 7 (26.92%) 64 (47.06%) n/a
No treatment available 3 (4.29%) 4 (15.38%) 36 (26.47%) n/a
Married 50 (71.43%) 19 (73.08%) 97 (71.32%) 304 (74.69%)
Have children 56 (80.0%) 19 (73.08%) 107 (78.68%) 284 (69.78%)
Used a mobility aid or assistive device (past 12 months) 10 (14.29%) 10 (38.46%) 20 (14.71%) 36 (8.85%)
Reported acute pain (past 12 months) 30 (42.86%) 15 (57.69%) 73 (53.68%) 149 (36.61%)
Reported chronic pain (past 12 months) 27 (38.57%) 16 (61.54%) 61 (44.85%) 158 (38.82%)
Currently have a Target Joint(s) or Problem Joint(s)2 30 (42.86%) 13 (50.0%) 29 (21.32%) n/a
Report chronic pain in a Target Joint(s) or Problem Joint(s)2 18 (60%) 7 (53.85%) 15 (65.52%) n/a
Currently have Joint(s) with reduced Range of Motion (ROM) 29 (41.43%) 13 (50.0%) 27 (19.85%) n/a
Ever had Joint Surgery or Other Invasive Procedure 23 (32.86%) 15 (57.69%) 59 (43.38%) 129 (31.7%)
Current difficulty with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) affected 21 (30.0%) 12 (46.15%) 29 (21.32%) 70 (17.2%)
Unemployed or on long-term disability (not a student) 5 (7.14%) 3 (11.54%) 3 (2.21%) 15 (3.69%)
Working full or part-time 39 (55.71%) 5 (19.23%) 87 (63.97%) 239 (58.72%)
Retired 3 (4.29%) 2 (7.69%) 15 (11.03%) 40 (9.83%)
Stay at home parent 11 (15.71%) 2 (7.69%) 8 (5.88%) 39 (9.58%)
Student (full or part-time) 13 (18.57%) 4 (15.38%) 14 (10.29%) 52 (12.78%)
Average days missed school or work due to health (SD) 29.74 (86.41) 24.8 (72.62) 15.45 (49.03) 10.5 (48.13)
EQ-5D-5L 0.867 0.806 0.650 0.897
PROBE Score 0.848 0.766 0.817 0.872
Annual Bleed Rate
0 17 (24.29%) 4 (15.38%) 74 (54.41%) n/a
1 5 (7.14%) 2 (7.69%) 24 (17.65%) n/a
2-3 23 (32.86%) 7 (26.92%) 15 (11.03%) n/a
4-7 9 (12.86%) 5 (19.23%) 11 (8.09%) n/a
8-10 3 (4.29%) 4 (15.38%) 0 n/a
11-15 4 (5.71%) 2 (7.69%) 3 (2.21%) n/a
16-30 4 (5.71%) 1 (3.85%) 4 (2.94%) n/a
More than 30 3 (4.29%) 0 2 (1.47%) n/a
Bleeding in the past 2 weeks 25 (35.71%) 7 (26.92%) 16 (11.76%) n/a
Life threatening bleed (past 12 months) 10 (14.29%) 5 (19.23%) 4 (2.94%) n/a
1. WGwH who self-report having hemophilia or as carriers with a factor level <40.

2. Beginning with PROBE questionnaire Version 3, the generic question asking about target joints was revised to ask about ‘Problem Joint(s)’.  A Problem Joint is defined as having chronic joint pain and/or limited range of movement due to compromised joint integrity (e.g. chronic synovitis and/or hemophilic arthropathy), with or without persistent bleeding.

Oral Presentation: HERE

Development of Women, Girls, and People Who Have or Had the Potential to Menstruate (WGPPM) questionnaire for PROBE study

Kucher A, Skinner M. W., Clearfield E., Brennan F., Rotellini D., Colle Y., Wilton P. A. Development of Women, Girls, and People Who Have or Had the Potential to Menstruate (WGPPM) questionnaire for PROBE study. (2025), Book of Abstracts. Haemophilia, 31: 21-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70032

Objective

The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens, and Experiences (PROBE) survey was first developed in 2012. PROBE currently collects data from people with hemophilia A or B, including carriers, and people without a bleeding disorder (NoBD) who serve as a control group. To date, there has been limited global comparative patient reported data on health outcomes and quality of life (HRQoL) about WGPPM.

Methods

A targeted PubMed literature review was conducted to identify concepts impacting WGPPM quality-of-life. The study team also provided additional examples of past surveys for review. Novel topics and items were mapped to a conceptual framework. The resulting framework was compared to the PROBE questionnaire and subsequently PROBE was updated to include missing concepts. It is anticipated that this exploratory questionnaire will lead to an expanded PROBE to more comprehensively include WGPPM. The questionnaire was developed in consultation with the World Federation of Hemophilia, Coalition of the Americas, European Haemophilia Consortium and National Bleeding Disorders Foundation who constituted the project working group. The new WGPPM questionnaire will be initiated as an on-line survey.

Results

The group identified von Willebrand Disease (VWD), platelet disorders, rare factor deficiencies, and other rare bleeding disorders for inclusion. New concepts include access to healthcare (including specialties); visits to emergency room; bleeding episodes unique to WGPPM (e.g., menstrual bleeding; gynecological problems), decision-making around having children, and impact on social and leisure life.

Conclusions

To advance management and treatment for this underserved population it is crucial to collect and report comprehensive data on WGPPM health outcomes and quality of life.  The WGPPM PROBE exploratory pilot was launched in early 2025. Through this pilot we anticipate more accurate and comprehensive data will be available to support future advocacy, research, management and treatment.  Insights from the pilot will be applied to future PROBE updates.

Poster: HERE

Gene Therapy in Hemophilia A: the Impact of Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec on Patient Outcomes – Initial Results from Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) from the GENEr8-1 Trial

Skinner M, Chen E, Ibrahim Q, Kucher A, Germini F, Karimi M, Clearfield E , O’Mahony B , Jain M. Gene Therapy in Hemophilia A: the Impact of Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec on Patient Outcomes – Initial Results from Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) from the GENEr8-1 Trial. (Abstract). NHF (2023).

Objective

The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire is included in the phase 3, open-label, single-arm study (GENEr8-1) as a tertiary endpoint. The aim is to assess the effect of a single intravenous administration of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on patient-reported health and life experiences using PROBE.

Methods

134 adult men with FVIII ≤1 IU/dL without history of FVIII inhibitors and AAV5 antibodies previously receiving FVIII prophylaxis were enrolled in the GENEr8-1 trial for hemophilia A. Results from baseline, week 52 and week 104 were summarized. The PROBE questionnaire comprises four sections: demographics, general health problems, hemophilia-specific problems, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with the 5-level EQ-5D tool. While further validation to understand the performance of PROBE in this context of use is ongoing, this study summarized the initial PROBE summary score results (based on section 2) utilizing existing scoring algorithms. Change from baseline summary score was assessed with paired t-tests.

Summary

PROBE score was available for 124/134 (93%) at baseline, 129/132 (98%) at week 52, and 129/130 (99%) at week 104. Mean PROBE scores (SDs) were 0.82 (0.13), 0.87 (0.12) and 0.86 (0.13) at the baseline, week 52 and week 104 respectively. Average changes in score of  0.05 [95% CI: (0.03, 0.07), p <0.001] and 0.05 (0.02, 0.07), p<0.001) were observed at weeks 52 and 104. Item-level analyses suggested fewer participants reported pain, limitations in activities of daily living, and target joints at weeks 52 and 104 vs. baseline. Two years after treatment, the percentage of participants working full-time increased by >10% (Table 1). Overall, these results were consistent with EQ-5D results (Table 2).

Conclusions

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec led to measurable changes in HRQoL 2 years after a single administration. Further research is necessary to interpret clinically meaningful change in PROBE scores.

Disclosures

Er Chen: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.; Federico Germini: Bayer Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Mohit Jain: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.; Milad Karimi: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.;

Brian O’Mahony BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.CSL Behring; Mark Skinner: Bayer, Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc., Blue Cross Blue Shield, ICERMASACNHFNORD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Spark, Takeda, WFH, USA

Poster: HERE

 

Initial results of the impact of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on pain occurrence and interference: Insights from PROBE

Skinner M, Chen E, Kucher A, Germini F, Karimi M, Clearfield E , O’Mahony B , Jain M. Initial results of the impact of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on pain occurrence and interference: Insights from PROBE. (Abstract). NHF (2023).

Introduction

People with severe haemophilia A (PwSHA) commonly present with intramuscular bleeding and hemarthrosis, leading to acute and chronic pain with an overall reduction in health-related quality of life. Here, we report the occurrence of pain in PwSHA before and 2 years after administration of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, and its interference on daily life.

Methods

The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire was included in the phase 3, open-label, single-arm study (GENEr8-1) as a tertiary endpoint to assess the effect of a single 6 × 1013 vg/kg dose of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on patient-reported health and life experiences. While further validation to understand the performance of PROBE in this context of use is ongoing, this study summarized pain-related outcomes collected within the PROBE questionnaire. This analysis evaluated PROBE completions at baseline and 104 weeks post gene therapy, including any occurrence of acute and chronic pain (recall: 12 months) and during eight activities (walking, stair climbing, nighttime, resting, weight bearing, playing, after falling/trauma, other). Participants also reported pain interference in 11 aspects of life (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, attending school, relations with others, sleep, enjoyment of life, playing/participating in sports/exercising, lifting, other). Descriptive statistics including 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented at baseline and Week 104.

Results

Data were available for 124 participants at baseline and 129 at 104 weeks. Median age was 34 (range 21−73 years). Reporting of acute and chronic pain was reduced post gene therapy (acute pain: 60.5% to 41.9%, chronic pain: 65.3% to 57.0%). At 104 weeks, the aggregate instances of self-reported acute pain occurrence decreased from 151 (15.2%) to 113 (10.9%) across the 8 activities (including ‘Other’) [Table 1]. Chronic pain reduced from 238 (24.0%) to 216 (20.9%) [Table 2]. At 104 weeks, the aggregate instances of self-reported acute pain interference decreased from 294 (21.4%) to 204 (14.4%) across the 11 activities (including ‘Other’) [Table 3]. Chronic pain interference was reduced from 332 (24.3%) to 262 (18.5%) [Table 3 and 4].

Conclusions

Initial analysis of PROBE data demonstrates that gene therapy may be associated with a decrease in self-reported acute and chronic pain occurrence and interference with daily life in the study cohort.  Pain is one of the core outcomes of importance to people with haemophilia. The impact of gene therapy on pain, particularly chronic pain as demonstrated from PROBE, a haemophilia-specific tool, has important implications on treatment decision-making and continued disease management.

Disclosures

Er Chen: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.; Federico Germini: Bayer Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Mohit Jain: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.; Milad Karimi: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.;

Brian O’Mahony BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.CSL Behring; Mark Skinner: Bayer, Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc., Blue Cross Blue Shield, ICERMASACNHFNORD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Spark, Takeda, WFH, USA

Poster: HERE

 

Initial results of the impact of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on pain occurrence and interference: Insights from PROBE

Skinner M, Chen E, Kucher A, Germini F, Karimi M, Clearfield E , O’Mahony B , Jain M. Initial results of the impact of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on pain occurrence and interference: Insights from PROBE. (2023), CCS_Book of abstracts. Haemophilia, 29: 3-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.14781

Introduction

People with severe haemophilia A (PwSHA) commonly present with intramuscular bleeding and hemarthrosis, leading to acute and chronic pain with an overall reduction in health-related quality of life. Here, we report the occurrence of pain in PwSHA before and 2 years after administration of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, and its interference on daily life.

Methods

The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire was included in the phase 3, open-label, single-arm study (GENEr8-1) as a tertiary endpoint to assess the effect of a single 6 × 1013 vg/kg dose of valoctocogene roxaparvovec on patient-reported health and life experiences. While further validation to understand the performance of PROBE in this context of use is ongoing, this study summarized pain-related outcomes collected within the PROBE questionnaire. This analysis evaluated PROBE completions at baseline and 104 weeks post gene therapy, including any occurrence of acute and chronic pain (recall: 12 months) and during eight activities (walking, stair climbing, nighttime, resting, weight bearing, playing, after falling/trauma, other). Participants also reported pain interference in 11 aspects of life (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, attending school, relations with others, sleep, enjoyment of life, playing/participating in sports/exercising, lifting, other). Descriptive statistics including 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented at baseline and Week 104.

Results

Data were available for 124 participants at baseline and 129 at 104 weeks. Median age was 34 (range 21−73 years). Reporting of acute and chronic pain was reduced post gene therapy (acute pain: 60.5% to 41.9%, chronic pain: 65.3% to 57.0%). At 104 weeks, the aggregate instances of self-reported acute pain occurrence decreased from 151 (15.2%) to 113 (10.9%) across the 8 activities (including ‘Other’) [Table 1]. Chronic pain reduced from 238 (24.0%) to 216 (20.9%) [Table 2]. At 104 weeks, the aggregate instances of self-reported acute pain interference decreased from 294 (21.4%) to 204 (14.4%) across the 11 activities (including ‘Other’) [Table 3]. Chronic pain interference was reduced from 332 (24.3%) to 262 (18.5%) [Table 3 and 4].

Conclusions

Initial analysis of PROBE data demonstrates that gene therapy may be associated with a decrease in self-reported acute and chronic pain occurrence and interference with daily life in the study cohort.  Pain is one of the core outcomes of importance to people with haemophilia. The impact of gene therapy on pain, particularly chronic pain as demonstrated from PROBE, a haemophilia-specific tool, has important implications on treatment decision-making and continued disease management.

Disclosures

Er Chen: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.; Federico Germini: Bayer Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Mohit Jain: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.; Milad Karimi: Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc.;

Brian O’Mahony BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.CSL Behring; Mark Skinner: Bayer, Bio Marin Pharmaceutical Inc., Blue Cross Blue Shield, ICERMASACNHFNORD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Spark, Takeda, WFH, USA

Oral Presentation: HERE

 

Test-Retest Reliability of a Mobile Application of the Patient Reported Outcomes Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Study

Curtis R, Wu J, Iorio A, Frick N, Nichol M, Noone D, O’Mahony B, Page D, Stonebraker J, Kucher A, Clearfield E, Skinner MW, Germini F. Test-retest reliability of a mobile application of the patient reported outcomes burdens and experiences (PROBE) study. Haemophilia. 2024 May;30(3):702-708. doi: 10.1111/hae.14969. Epub 2024 Mar 4. PMID: 38439137.

Introduction

The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens, and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome tool that assesses quality of life and disease burden in people with haemophilia (PWH).

Aim

To assesses the test-retest reliability of PROBE when completed using the mobile phone application.

Methods

We recruited PWH, including carriers, and individuals with no bleeding disorders who attended haemophilia-related workshops or via social media. Participants completed PROBE three times (twice on the app: T1 and T2, and once on the web, T3). Test-retest reliability was analysed for T1 versus T2 (app to app, time period one) and T2 versus T3 (app to web, time period two).

Results

We enrolled 48 participants (median age = 56 [range 27-78] years). Eighteen participants (37.5%) were PWH and seven (14.6%) were carriers. On general health domain questions, we found almost perfect agreement, except for a question on the frequency of use of pain medication in the last 12 months [Kappa coefficient (κ) .72 and .37 for time period one and two, respectively] and any use of pain medications (κ .75) for time period two. For haemophilia-related questions, we found substantial to perfect agreement, except for the questions on the number of joint bleeds in the previous 6 months for time period one (κ .49) and the number of bleeds in the previous two weeks for time period two (κ .34).

Conclusions

The results demonstrate the reliability of the PROBE app. The app can be used interchangeably with the paper and web platforms for PROBE administration.

Disclosures

This disclaimer relates to PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Bookshelf. These three resources are scientific literature databases offered to the public by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). NLM is not a publisher, but rather collects, indexes, and archives scientific literature published by other organizations. The presence of any article, book, or document in these databases does not imply an endorsement of, or concurrence with, the contents by NLM, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the U.S. Federal Government.